What ARE these banks tHinKiNg?
I just got back from driving all over the world for a bank. Why? We were countering back and forth and finally came to a verbal agreement last Wednesday. So, the listing agent sent me the banks required addendums, pretty standard. My job was to get them signed and deliver them back to the listing agent via agreed upon forms on "notice" - as stated in the standard Georgia Association of Realtors contract AS WELL AS their "standard addendum" - acceptable notice defined as: fax, email, in person or via courrier. Notice the OR? Not one was deemed preferable over the other, therefore by default, any of those forms of notice should be acceptable, right?
Well, I got an email from the listing agent stating that the bank "requires original copies signed in blue"!!!! Therefore, I would have to deliver it in person or pay a courrier to deliver it. OK, fine. I can deal with that. Ridiculous, but still. Fine.
Then, I was told the addendums were incomplete and the bank would kick them back.There were 2 paragraphs which I advised my clients not to sign, allow me explain:
- One paragraph stated that they acknowledge the property has been winterized and they will pay for it to be de-winterized for inspection. There were two blanks for the buyers to initial by this specific paragraph.
- Since, as of the date we last saw the property, there were no signs that it had been winterized, they did not sign it.
- Instead we wrote a statement to the fact it had to yet been winterized, and they initialed that statement.
- The other paragraph stated that the buyers acknowledge that the house is tenant occupied, that it is their responsibily to pursue legal action to have the tenants removed after closing, and that they have seen the lease and agree to its terms.
- First of all, the house is vacant, no sign of tenants at all.
- Second of all, we were never given a lease to review.
- Instead, we wrote a statement that it was vacant and no lease had been seen, and initialed that statement as well.
Now they're telling me that the bank is willing to lose the deal over not signing two paragraphs that are technically lies if we signed them?
It's like PULLING TEETH to try and sell a house these days! You'd think they would like to sell all the extra houses on their books due to foreclosures.
Don't get me wrong, short sales and foreclosures are still pretty much the best deals out there right now. As long as you don't mind the headaches you may have to endure along the way. My buyers are getting a great deal: a house in Powder Springs that sold in 2006 for $354,900 and was now listed at $265,900! (And they are getting it for less than that!) Recently Chris sold a house in Bentwater for $255,000 that was appraised at $370,000!
So, yes, it can definitely be worth it, which is why I will do whatever it takes to help my buyers get the best deal. Driving around last minute, to get signatures and the meet the agent's assistant to deliver "original blue ink signature copies" is nothing compared to getting an amazing house at an incredible price. I just don't understand why the banks have to make it harder than it should be!
Since then, the house has been winterized so we did go back and sign that paragraph. But the other paragraph still does bot hold true, as I asked the agent for a copy of the lease and he said there is not one. Let's hope they don't kill the deal because we won't commit fraud : )
Well, that's my rant for the evening. Thanks for listening =)
:D ianne



